Constitutional amendment I jeopardizes Medicaid expansion.

Constitutional amendment I would yank Medicaid eligibility for some 30,000 South Dakotans if the federal commitment to fund 90% of the cost of Medicaid expansion.  I get that Medicaid expansion passed by a vote in 2022, when it was clear that the feds would pay for 90% of it. If for some reason that promise changes and drops to a level below 90%, constitutional amendment I would end the program.

This seems harsh to me.

A peremptory denial of health care to people desperately in need of it based on a change in the funding formula is inhumane. We South Dakotans can do better, particularly in a state that consistently brags about its budget surpluses. 2026 marked 15 consecutive years during which our state has had a budget surplus.

Finding a way to use that excess cash for poor people who need health care seems like the right thing to do.  

Vote no on this harsh and uncharitable dismissal of needy people.

John Tsitrian is a businessman and writer from the Black Hills. He was a weekly columnist for the Rapid City Journal for 20 years. His articles and commentary have also appeared in The Los Angeles Times, The Denver Post and The Omaha World-Herald. Tsitrian served in the Marines for three years (1966-69), including a 13-month tour of duty as a radioman in Vietnam. Republish with permission.       

Photo: public domain, wikimedia commons 

The South Dakota Standard is offered freely and is supported by our readers. We have no political or commercial sponsorship. If you'd like to help us continue our mission to advance independent political and social commentary, you can do so by clicking on the "Donate" button that's on the sidebar to your right.